PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.55%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 2.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.50%
Less D&A growth vs. GOOG's 12.19%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-443.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-6.63%
Negative yoy SBC while GOOG is 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
173.16%
Less working capital growth vs. GOOG's 422.16%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
59.37%
AR growth well above GOOG's 34.20%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
281.46%
Some inventory rise while GOOG is negative at -58.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
498.28%
AP growth well above GOOG's 283.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
294.52%
Growth well above GOOG's 405.35%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-247.62%
Negative yoy while GOOG is 27.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.38%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GOOG's 16.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.48%
Some CapEx rise while GOOG is negative at -24.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
62.16%
Acquisition spending well above GOOG's 15.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
24.39%
Some yoy expansion while GOOG is negative at -40.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
70.37%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GOOG's 46.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-91.80%
We reduce yoy other investing while GOOG is 1586.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
95.97%
We have mild expansions while GOOG is negative at -10.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-87.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GOOG is 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while GOOG is 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.