PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.87%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 9.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
0.95%
Less D&A growth vs. GOOG's 4.09%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
195.17%
Well above GOOG's 225.56% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
1.13%
SBC growth well above GOOG's 2.07%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
89.36%
Slight usage while GOOG is negative at -179.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-267.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -141.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
215.79%
Inventory growth well above GOOG's 226.80%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
26.22%
Lower AP growth vs. GOOG's 386.13%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
204.02%
Some yoy usage while GOOG is negative at -190.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
146.58%
Some yoy increase while GOOG is negative at -19.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
28.48%
Some CFO growth while GOOG is negative at -2.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-24.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 6.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-433.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -48.65%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
21.74%
Some yoy expansion while GOOG is negative at -16.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
49.68%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GOOG's 14.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-5.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -74.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
1866.36%
We have mild expansions while GOOG is negative at -9.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
25.54%
Debt repayment above 1.5x GOOG's 0.42%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -6.84%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.