PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GOOG at -20.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.05%
D&A growth well above GOOG's 9.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-175.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
3.82%
Less SBC growth vs. GOOG's 13.91%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
4.74%
Less working capital growth vs. GOOG's 140.31%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
225.47%
AR growth well above GOOG's 175.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-69.61%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GOOG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-200.68%
Both negative yoy AP, with GOOG at -305.10%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-101.38%
Negative yoy usage while GOOG is 63.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-750.00%
Negative yoy while GOOG is 163.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-22.25%
Negative yoy CFO while GOOG is 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-1.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -53.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-63.10%
Negative yoy acquisition while GOOG stands at 55.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
33.23%
Purchases well above GOOG's 28.44%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.52%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GOOG at -18.41%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
194.31%
Growth well above GOOG's 255.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-181.99%
We reduce yoy invests while GOOG stands at 17.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-35.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -157.97%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.61%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x GOOG's 1.28%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.