PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.07%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.95%
Some D&A expansion while GOOG is negative at -58.87%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-138.08%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GOOG stands at 8.44%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.95%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GOOG at -1.46%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-27.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOG at -585.17%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-319.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -131.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Negative yoy AP while GOOG is 91.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
341.98%
Some yoy usage while GOOG is negative at -489.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
195.41%
Well above GOOG's 160.57%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-4.89%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GOOG at -38.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-17.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -36.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-68.42%
Negative yoy acquisition while GOOG stands at 76.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -102.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
60.04%
At 50-75% of GOOG's 111.91%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
89.19%
Growth well above GOOG's 89.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-6.50%
We reduce yoy invests while GOOG stands at 13.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-14.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -36.42%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -2.56%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.