PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.76%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 14.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.37%
Less D&A growth vs. GOOG's 118.36%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
60.72%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. GOOG's 125.09%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
4.03%
SBC growth while GOOG is negative at -6.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
117.55%
Well above GOOG's 76.02% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
188.64%
AR growth well above GOOG's 148.59%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while GOOG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-287.21%
Both negative yoy AP, with GOOG at -597.42%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-152.71%
Negative yoy usage while GOOG is 65.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
642.11%
Well above GOOG's 225.76%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-0.81%
Negative yoy CFO while GOOG is 52.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.50%
Some CapEx rise while GOOG is negative at -9.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -110.34%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-487.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while GOOG stands at 25.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
96.06%
We have some liquidation growth while GOOG is negative at -26.10%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-202.86%
We reduce yoy other investing while GOOG is 253.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-34.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -38.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.61%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GOOG is 43.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-152.57%
We cut yoy buybacks while GOOG is 3.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.