PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.42%
Some net income increase while GOOGL is negative at -21.87%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
26.62%
D&A growth well above GOOGL's 23.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1895.65%
Some yoy growth while GOOGL is negative at -3.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-83.82%
Negative yoy SBC while GOOGL is 15.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
102.00%
Slight usage while GOOGL is negative at -14.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
52.83%
AR growth while GOOGL is negative at -38.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.88%
Some inventory rise while GOOGL is negative at -91.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
660.00%
AP growth well above GOOGL's 22.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
108.25%
Growth well above GOOGL's 18.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-44.75%
Negative yoy while GOOGL is 87.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.31%
Some CFO growth while GOOGL is negative at -5.83%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
58.60%
Some CapEx rise while GOOGL is negative at -12.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
38.91%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. GOOGL's 94.67%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
73.15%
Some yoy expansion while GOOGL is negative at -26.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
192.64%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GOOGL's 29.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
150.00%
Growth well above GOOGL's 31.55%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
93.97%
Investing outflow well above GOOGL's 73.30%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-22.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOGL at -13.55%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.01%
Negative yoy issuance while GOOGL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.