743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
242.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 15.94%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.59%
Some D&A expansion while GOOGL is negative at -5.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-102.82%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GOOGL stands at 169.90%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-7.61%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GOOGL at -1.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
295.65%
Slight usage while GOOGL is negative at -403.94%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
167.50%
AR growth well above GOOGL's 145.80%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-112.04%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GOOGL at -225.66%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
105.26%
AP growth well above GOOGL's 138.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-33.96%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOGL at -244.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-14.29%
Negative yoy while GOOGL is 27.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
5.58%
Some CFO growth while GOOGL is negative at -22.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-65.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOGL at -17.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.12%
Purchases well above GOOGL's 19.40%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-34.59%
We reduce yoy sales while GOOGL is 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-99.18%
We reduce yoy other investing while GOOGL is 4438.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-160.93%
We reduce yoy invests while GOOGL stands at 55.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
19.26%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of GOOGL's 28.58%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.85%
Buyback growth of 85.85% while GOOGL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.