PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.63%
Some net income increase while GOOGL is negative at -7.99%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
19.13%
Some D&A expansion while GOOGL is negative at -5.44%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-92.31%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
6.70%
SBC growth well above GOOGL's 4.60%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-111.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOGL at -1.90%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
28.45%
AR growth while GOOGL is negative at -165.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-91.58%
Negative yoy inventory while GOOGL is 800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-2000.00%
Negative yoy AP while GOOGL is 324.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-90.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOGL at -41.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-4.69%
Negative yoy while GOOGL is 97.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-28.14%
Negative yoy CFO while GOOGL is 8.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-5.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOGL at -42.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
86.89%
Some acquisitions while GOOGL is negative at -88.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
53.71%
Purchases well above GOOGL's 38.87%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
4.93%
We have some liquidation growth while GOOGL is negative at -35.39%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
51800.00%
We have some outflow growth while GOOGL is negative at -235.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
247.39%
We have mild expansions while GOOGL is negative at -52.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1648.35%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GOOGL is 6.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.27%
Buyback growth of 3.27% while GOOGL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.