743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.75%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 2.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-3.65%
Negative yoy D&A while GOOGL is 4.83%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
98.28%
Well above GOOGL's 125.62% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.37%
SBC growth while GOOGL is negative at -1.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-41.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOGL at -231.94%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
145.06%
AR growth well above GOOGL's 131.30%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-106.32%
Negative yoy inventory while GOOGL is 113.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-123.26%
Both negative yoy AP, with GOOGL at -44.69%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-95.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOGL at -195.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-125.93%
Both negative yoy, with GOOGL at -247.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.39%
Some CFO growth while GOOGL is negative at -16.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.84%
Some CapEx rise while GOOGL is negative at -3.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while GOOGL is negative at -2355.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
3.10%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. GOOGL's 11.21%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
25.95%
We have some liquidation growth while GOOGL is negative at -37.27%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
93.33%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GOOGL's 250.10%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
26.12%
We have mild expansions while GOOGL is negative at -351.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
16.00%
We repay more while GOOGL is negative at -0.08%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while GOOGL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.