743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-26.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GOOGL at -24.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.54%
Some D&A expansion while GOOGL is negative at -7.10%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-23.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-17.87%
Negative yoy SBC while GOOGL is 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
219.25%
Well above GOOGL's 277.78% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
124.28%
AR growth well above GOOGL's 160.64%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
82.24%
Some inventory rise while GOOGL is negative at -251.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-178.95%
Both negative yoy AP, with GOOGL at -104.37%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
62.28%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GOOGL's 386.83%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
300.00%
Well above GOOGL's 96.89%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
7.39%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 3.98%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
2.90%
Lower CapEx growth vs. GOOGL's 17.57%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
93.91%
Some acquisitions while GOOGL is negative at -149.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-5.75%
Negative yoy purchasing while GOOGL stands at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-24.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GOOGL at -28.82%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
109.79%
We have some outflow growth while GOOGL is negative at -78.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
57.01%
We have mild expansions while GOOGL is negative at -125.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-6.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOGL at -34.36%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while GOOGL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while GOOGL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.