PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.37%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 27.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.96%
D&A growth well above PINS's 15.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
314.89%
Deferred tax of 314.89% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
24.19%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -18.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-213.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -125.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-179.57%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PINS at -162.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-324.66%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PINS at -3.74%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
4800.00%
A yoy AP increase while PINS is negative at -126.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-356.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -0.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
25.00%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -3.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.86%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PINS at -413.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-23.01%
Negative yoy CapEx while PINS is 35.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
67.35%
Acquisition growth of 67.35% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-5.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -157.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-4.36%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 12.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
107700.00%
We have some outflow growth while PINS is negative at -113.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-85.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -121.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.78%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.