PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.61%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 50.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.06%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -7.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.30%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-12.31%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PINS at -1.79%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
115.73%
Well above PINS's 83.22% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
22.01%
AR growth well above PINS's 32.91%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
221.16%
Some inventory rise while PINS is negative at -0.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-24.49%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 303.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
212.68%
Some yoy usage while PINS is negative at -0.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-70.00%
Both negative yoy, with PINS at -177.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
19.00%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 69.97%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
3.35%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PINS's 24.21%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-350.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-2.68%
Negative yoy purchasing while PINS stands at 40.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-33.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PINS at -33.71%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.28%
We reduce yoy other investing while PINS is 135.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-78.26%
We reduce yoy invests while PINS stands at 103.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.08%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.