PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
132.84%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 89.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-5.73%
Negative yoy D&A while PINS is 12.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
17400.00%
Deferred tax of 17400.00% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-4.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PINS at -88.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-89.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PINS is 83.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
67.40%
AR growth well above PINS's 82.54%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-62.72%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PINS at -238.14%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
1012.50%
AP growth well above PINS's 684.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-86.01%
Negative yoy usage while PINS is 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
233.33%
Well above PINS's 66.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 115.10%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
2.78%
Some CapEx rise while PINS is negative at -3.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-233.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -712.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
21.70%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x PINS's 5.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
84.38%
We have some outflow growth while PINS is negative at -470.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-25.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -536.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 59.60%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.