PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
42.99%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 320.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.72%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -12.62%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
74.97%
Deferred tax of 74.97% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.60%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -5.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-937.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -100.09%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-711.41%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PINS at -76.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
1294.12%
Some inventory rise while PINS is negative at -76.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-140.29%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 484.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
770.90%
Some yoy usage while PINS is negative at -3.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
785.71%
Well above PINS's 10.27%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
42.86%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 208.70%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -24.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
98.94%
Acquisition growth of 98.94% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
59.40%
Purchases well above PINS's 18.31%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-27.39%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PINS at -7.46%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-800.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while PINS is 70.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.84%
Investing outflow well above PINS's 39.90%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-8.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 812871.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.