PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.45%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 420.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.66%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -0.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-45.22%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
39.23%
SBC growth well above PINS's 26.18%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-34.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -143.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-260.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PINS at -144.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
68.12%
Some inventory rise while PINS is negative at -8.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
146.40%
A yoy AP increase while PINS is negative at -8.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
68.18%
Growth well above PINS's 7.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
68.18%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -67.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
8.20%
Some CFO growth while PINS is negative at -61.26%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-7.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -74.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -17.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
24.92%
At 75-90% of PINS's 30.09%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
-2950.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while PINS is 71.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-68.14%
We reduce yoy invests while PINS stands at 66.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
18.54%
Debt repayment growth of 18.54% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.72%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.