PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.55%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 35.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.50%
D&A growth well above PINS's 0.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-443.23%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.63%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PINS at -3.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
173.16%
Well above PINS's 60.28% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
59.37%
AR growth well above PINS's 51.65%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
281.46%
Some inventory rise while PINS is negative at -8.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
498.28%
Lower AP growth vs. PINS's 1298.46%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
294.52%
Growth well above PINS's 8.40%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-247.62%
Both negative yoy, with PINS at -98.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.38%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 58.13%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.48%
CapEx growth well above PINS's 12.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
62.16%
Acquisition growth of 62.16% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
24.39%
Purchases well above PINS's 0.26%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
70.37%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x PINS's 20.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-91.80%
We reduce yoy other investing while PINS is 644.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
95.97%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PINS's 528.26%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-87.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.