PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PINS at -103.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.05%
D&A growth well above PINS's 0.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-175.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.82%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -47.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
4.74%
Less working capital growth vs. PINS's 200.58%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
225.47%
AR growth well above PINS's 220.22%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-69.61%
Negative yoy inventory while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-200.68%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 88.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-101.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -171.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-750.00%
Both negative yoy, with PINS at -88.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-22.25%
Negative yoy CFO while PINS is 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-1.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -86.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-63.10%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
33.23%
Purchases well above PINS's 31.22%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.52%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PINS at -10.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
194.31%
Growth well above PINS's 252.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-181.99%
We reduce yoy invests while PINS stands at 266.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-35.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.61%
Buyback growth of 52.61% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.