PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.72%
Some net income increase while PINS is negative at -1292.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.23%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -68.31%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
47.14%
Deferred tax of 47.14% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
1.43%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -15.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
33.21%
Less working capital growth vs. PINS's 205.31%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
249.94%
AR growth well above PINS's 211.32%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-226.03%
Both negative yoy AP, with PINS at -1235.47%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-58.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -468.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-79.48%
Negative yoy while PINS is 553.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-3.54%
Negative yoy CFO while PINS is 214.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.34%
Some CapEx rise while PINS is negative at -88.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-616.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -118.77%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
88.53%
Purchases well above PINS's 2.56%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-76.40%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 26.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
80.77%
Growth well above PINS's 118.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
10.46%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PINS's 121.43%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-12.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -153.71%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.