PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.73%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 119.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.00%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -3.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
368.16%
Well above PINS's 192.25% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.99%
Negative yoy SBC while PINS is 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-128.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PINS is 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.39%
AR growth while PINS is negative at -39.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1300.00%
AP growth well above PINS's 157.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-118.56%
Negative yoy usage while PINS is 24.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-6.76%
Both negative yoy, with PINS at -167.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
17.87%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 73.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-5.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -20.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
54.22%
Acquisition spending well above PINS's 23.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-40.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -27.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-18.83%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 27.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1333.33%
We have some outflow growth while PINS is negative at -23.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-16.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -23.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-21.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.44%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 83.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.