PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.01%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 2887.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.95%
D&A growth well above PINS's 8.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-138.08%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.95%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PINS at -5.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-27.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -33.34%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-319.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PINS at -80.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both negative yoy AP, with PINS at -1.77%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
341.98%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PINS's 1117.19%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
195.41%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -15.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-4.89%
Negative yoy CFO while PINS is 138.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-17.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -337.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-68.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -166.24%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-16.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while PINS stands at 40.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
60.04%
We have some liquidation growth while PINS is negative at -27.77%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
89.19%
Growth well above PINS's 166.24%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-6.50%
We reduce yoy invests while PINS stands at 153.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-14.98%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -12.85%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.