PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PINS at -112.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.37%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -8.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
60.72%
Some yoy growth while PINS is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.03%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -0.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
117.55%
Less working capital growth vs. PINS's 317.49%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
188.64%
AR growth well above PINS's 243.62%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above PINS's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-287.21%
Both negative yoy AP, with PINS at -37.73%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-152.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -75.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
642.11%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -342.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.81%
Negative yoy CFO while PINS is 37.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.50%
Some CapEx rise while PINS is negative at -182.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-487.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -38.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
96.06%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x PINS's 28.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-202.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -65.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -114.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.61%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-152.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -9.46%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.