PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.43%
Net income growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.52%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.44%
D&A growth of 0.44% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
70.40%
Deferred tax of 70.40% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.94%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -79.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-98.43%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-435.71%
AR is negative yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
34.36%
Inventory growth of 34.36% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
306.67%
AP growth of 306.67% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
37.84%
Growth of 37.84% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-83.33%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 248.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
10.59%
CFO growth of 10.59% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-9.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
90.27%
Acquisition growth of 90.27% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
18.00%
Purchases growth of 18.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
163.36%
Liquidation growth of 163.36% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-8.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
80.17%
We expand invests by 80.17% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
21.28%
Debt repayment growth of 21.28% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.