PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.09%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -10.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.98%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 18.76%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-18.46%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.76%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -14.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-177.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -6220.53%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-284.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -135.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
909.76%
Inventory growth of 909.76% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-2150.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -710.64%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
930.23%
Some yoy usage while SNAP is negative at -266.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-53.85%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 9.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
7.21%
Some CFO growth while SNAP is negative at -44.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.10%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -31.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1800.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-108.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -483.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-1.53%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
24.24%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 96.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-196.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -236.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.