PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.98%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -36.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.89%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 42.97%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1447.37%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 89.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.47%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -54.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
170.64%
Well above SNAP's 85.10% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-299.60%
AR is negative yoy while SNAP is 26.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
56300.00%
Inventory growth of 56300.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
94.44%
AP growth well above SNAP's 154.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
57200.00%
Growth well above SNAP's 136.67%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
75.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SNAP's 152.52%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
37.82%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SNAP's 22.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-15.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -18.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
32.79%
Some acquisitions while SNAP is negative at -109.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
35.68%
Purchases well above SNAP's 47.05%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-24.88%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 49.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-362.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
36.64%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 175.89%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to SNAP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.