PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.13%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -1199.74%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.28%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 17.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
67.19%
Some yoy growth while SNAP is negative at -106.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.33%
Less SBC growth vs. SNAP's 29338.76%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
222.29%
Well above SNAP's 411.02% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
160.24%
AR growth well above SNAP's 133.66%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-104.79%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-128.57%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 16.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-105.60%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 53.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-28.57%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 51.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.60%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 7.59%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-0.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 49.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-40.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -584.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-45.47%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 15.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
152.38%
Growth of 152.38% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-198.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -948.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.