PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.37%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 8.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.96%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 4.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
314.89%
Some yoy growth while SNAP is negative at -92.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
24.19%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 17.34%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-213.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -986.23%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-179.57%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -128.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-324.66%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4800.00%
AP growth well above SNAP's 73.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-356.88%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 147.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
25.00%
Some yoy increase while SNAP is negative at -73.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.86%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 14.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-23.01%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
67.35%
Acquisition growth of 67.35% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-5.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 12.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.36%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -30.54%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
107700.00%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -4075.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-85.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -61.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.78%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.