PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.61%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 7.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.06%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 10.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-70.30%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-12.31%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -18.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
115.73%
Well above SNAP's 116.14% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
22.01%
AR growth while SNAP is negative at -35.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
221.16%
Inventory growth of 221.16% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-24.49%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 121.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
212.68%
Growth well above SNAP's 337.23%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-70.00%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 743.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
19.00%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 33.51%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
3.35%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SNAP's 24.69%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-350.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-2.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -6.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-33.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -3.12%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.28%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-78.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -27.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.08%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.