PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
33.97%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 41.05%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
10.66%
Some D&A expansion while SNAP is negative at -8.90%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
570.00%
Some yoy growth while SNAP is negative at -312.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-6.63%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -3.97%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-980.45%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -2633.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-219.84%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -396.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-129.32%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
259.46%
AP growth well above SNAP's 432.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-122.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -77.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-733.33%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -101.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.51%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 4.90%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-30.60%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 13.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-90.28%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
54.35%
Purchases well above SNAP's 24.28%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-25.67%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -8.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-600.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
11.75%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 81.37%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.76%
Buyback growth of 17.76% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.