PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
132.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.89%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-5.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SNAP at -8.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
17400.00%
Some yoy growth while SNAP is negative at -41.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-4.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -17.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-89.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -101.51%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
67.40%
AR growth while SNAP is negative at -58.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-62.72%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1012.50%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -79.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-86.01%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 2462.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
233.33%
Well above SNAP's 112.52%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 20.50%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
2.78%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -4.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-233.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-43.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -293.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
21.70%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SNAP's 8.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
84.38%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-25.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -472.64%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.