PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.65%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -5.86%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.67%
Some D&A expansion while SNAP is negative at -0.13%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-325.71%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.92%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 3.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-275.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 99.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-417.38%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -86.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-45.87%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
25.84%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -281.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
67.35%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SNAP's 450.43%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-120.00%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -344.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-2.41%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 12.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -14.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-4350.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
35.68%
Purchases well above SNAP's 50.31%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-10.56%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 13.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
730.00%
Growth of 730.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
20.08%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 79.07%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
2.08%
Debt repayment well below SNAP's 99.97%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.