PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-33.30%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -27.10%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.79%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 2.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
220.76%
Well above SNAP's 42.57% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.87%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 3.24%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
542.90%
Less working capital growth vs. SNAP's 99460.20%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
220.57%
AR growth well above SNAP's 179.31%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-25.59%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-139.29%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-30.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -101.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
200.00%
Well above SNAP's 274.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
21.12%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 109.40%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
13.22%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -19.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
92.58%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-65.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -6.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
40.65%
Below 50% of SNAP's 95.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-166.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1.81%
We reduce yoy invests while SNAP stands at 357.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
29.08%
Debt repayment well below SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.55%
Buyback growth of 3.55% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.