PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.55%
Negative net income growth while SNAP stands at 52.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.50%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 15.00%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-443.23%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.63%
Negative yoy SBC while SNAP is 17.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
173.16%
Well above SNAP's 61.23% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
59.37%
AR growth well above SNAP's 23.81%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
281.46%
Inventory growth of 281.46% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
498.28%
AP growth well above SNAP's 122.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
294.52%
Growth well above SNAP's 40.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-247.62%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -164.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.38%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 170.78%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.48%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -35.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
62.16%
Some acquisitions while SNAP is negative at -23.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
24.39%
Purchases well above SNAP's 23.36%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
70.37%
We have some liquidation growth while SNAP is negative at -47.27%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-91.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -1900.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
95.97%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -217.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-87.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.