PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.87%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 131.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.95%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 7.24%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
195.17%
Deferred tax of 195.17% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
1.13%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -1.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
89.36%
Slight usage while SNAP is negative at -48.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-267.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -16.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
215.79%
Inventory growth of 215.79% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
26.22%
Lower AP growth vs. SNAP's 226.14%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
204.02%
Some yoy usage while SNAP is negative at -80.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
146.58%
Well above SNAP's 48.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
28.48%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 159.29%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-24.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -23.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-433.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -259.40%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
21.74%
Purchases well above SNAP's 9.84%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
49.68%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SNAP's 5.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-5.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 78.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
1866.36%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -7.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
25.54%
Debt repayment growth of 25.54% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.