PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -1694.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.05%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 9.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-175.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.82%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -7.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
4.74%
Less working capital growth vs. SNAP's 183.86%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
225.47%
AR growth well above SNAP's 181.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-69.61%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-200.68%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 52.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-101.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -1067.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-750.00%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 236.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-22.25%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SNAP at -31.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-1.32%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-63.10%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 99.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
33.23%
Some yoy expansion while SNAP is negative at -144.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-69.52%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -34.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
194.31%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -2396.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-181.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -509.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-35.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.61%
Buyback growth of 52.61% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.