PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -17.36%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-8.21%
Negative yoy D&A while SNAP is 108.11%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
19.54%
Deferred tax of 19.54% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
34.15%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 15.74%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-83.80%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -227.55%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-120.41%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -164.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
126.87%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -107.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
146.15%
Growth well above SNAP's 63.80%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
185.52%
Some yoy increase while SNAP is negative at -79.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-13.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SNAP at -197.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-39.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -10.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
57.44%
Some acquisitions while SNAP is negative at -1323.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
45.43%
Purchases well above SNAP's 57.23%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-42.22%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 76.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-106.03%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-45.62%
We reduce yoy invests while SNAP stands at 101.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
6.01%
Debt repayment well below SNAP's 99.80%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.95%
Buyback growth of 44.95% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.