PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.85%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 19.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.24%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 33.62%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-6.93%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.02%
Negative yoy SBC while SNAP is 31.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
240.39%
Slight usage while SNAP is negative at -209.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1517.14%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -1146.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4081.82%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -248.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
39414.29%
Growth well above SNAP's 24.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
619.15%
Well above SNAP's 136.20%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
49.74%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 123.95%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
3.54%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -24.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-82.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -80.20%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
71.47%
Purchases well above SNAP's 7.30%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-0.26%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -24.35%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
44.44%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 100.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
22.37%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -286.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-44.17%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -0.01%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.