PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.72%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -13.94%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.23%
Some D&A expansion while SNAP is negative at -27.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
47.14%
Deferred tax of 47.14% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
1.43%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -30.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
33.21%
Less working capital growth vs. SNAP's 238.38%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
249.94%
AR growth well above SNAP's 258.26%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-226.03%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -165.03%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-58.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -215.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-79.48%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -186.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-3.54%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 20.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.34%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -1.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-616.13%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
88.53%
Some yoy expansion while SNAP is negative at -14.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-76.40%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 27.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
80.77%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 14443.75%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
10.46%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 104.82%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-12.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.