PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.73%
Net income growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.40%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
9.00%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 3.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
368.16%
Deferred tax of 368.16% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-13.99%
Negative yoy SBC while SNAP is 12.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-128.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 15.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.39%
AR growth while SNAP is negative at -24.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1300.00%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -301.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-118.56%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 110.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-6.76%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 198.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
17.87%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 115.60%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-5.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -98.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
54.22%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-40.45%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 15.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-18.83%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -16.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
1333.33%
Growth well above SNAP's 87.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-16.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -19.73%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-21.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.44%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.