PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.01%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 32.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
10.95%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 26.97%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-138.08%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.95%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -6.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-27.74%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 84.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-319.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -19.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 928.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
341.98%
Some yoy usage while SNAP is negative at -93.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
195.41%
Well above SNAP's 78.06%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-4.89%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 1187.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-17.15%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 26.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-68.42%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 98.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
60.04%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SNAP's 18.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
89.19%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -662.01%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-6.50%
We reduce yoy invests while SNAP stands at 2071.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-14.98%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.49%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.