PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -22.90%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.37%
Some D&A expansion while SNAP is negative at -20.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
60.72%
Deferred tax of 60.72% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.03%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -20.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
117.55%
Less working capital growth vs. SNAP's 1712.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
188.64%
AR growth well above SNAP's 205.40%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-287.21%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -124.27%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-152.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -551.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
642.11%
Some yoy increase while SNAP is negative at -117.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SNAP at -46.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.50%
CapEx growth well above SNAP's 6.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-12.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-487.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -7718.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
96.06%
We have some liquidation growth while SNAP is negative at -43.82%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-202.86%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 100.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-34.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -121.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.61%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-152.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -24.14%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.