PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.86%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 18.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.79%
Some D&A expansion while SNAP is negative at -9.07%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-260.09%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
29.59%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -1.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-432.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -191.02%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.43%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -122.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.48%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -80.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
115.11%
Growth well above SNAP's 138.03%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
41.53%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SNAP's 361.83%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
0.64%
Some CFO growth while SNAP is negative at -124.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -3.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
20.83%
Acquisition growth of 20.83% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
52.24%
Some yoy expansion while SNAP is negative at -66.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-30.10%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 59.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
83.33%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -1211.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
4.99%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -63.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
5.08%
We repay more while SNAP is negative at -67.99%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.03%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 67.69%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.