PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.83%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 105.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.75%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 1.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.28%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -0.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-124.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -82.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-2182.52%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -222.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.84%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 169.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
51.27%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SNAP's 175.32%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
8900.00%
Some yoy increase while SNAP is negative at -307.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
13.20%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 99.04%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-74.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -9.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-143.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 51.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-7.22%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -54.10%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-93.55%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-149.40%
We reduce yoy invests while SNAP stands at 33.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
56.46%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of SNAP's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.