PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.13%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -1633.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-12.56%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SNAP at -4.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
25.45%
Deferred tax of 25.45% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-2.70%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -4.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.00%
Well above SNAP's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
194.16%
AR growth well above SNAP's 216.05%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-282.04%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 196.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
24.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SNAP's 154.33%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-14.16%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SNAP at -34.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
10.29%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SNAP's 22.91%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 31.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25.33%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SNAP's 14.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-1225.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
6.92%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 101.85%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-82.73%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.