PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.12%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 12.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.80%
D&A growth well above TWLO's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5.26%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
35.53%
SBC growth while TWLO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1000.00%
Well above TWLO's 108.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
163.73%
AR growth while TWLO is negative at -236.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.00%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -509.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-129.85%
Negative yoy usage while TWLO is 160.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-76.67%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 304.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-13.53%
Negative yoy CFO while TWLO is 45.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-144.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -1068.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-31.58%
Negative yoy acquisition while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-208.80%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.24%
Below 50% of TWLO's 194.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1574.42%
We reduce yoy invests while TWLO stands at 2200.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.96%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.