743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x TWLO's 12.02%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
26.62%
D&A growth well above TWLO's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1895.65%
Deferred tax of 1895.65% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-83.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with TWLO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
102.00%
Well above TWLO's 108.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
52.83%
AR growth while TWLO is negative at -236.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.88%
Inventory growth of 100.88% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
660.00%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -509.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
108.25%
Growth well above TWLO's 160.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-44.75%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 304.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.31%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of TWLO's 45.04%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
58.60%
Some CapEx rise while TWLO is negative at -1068.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
38.91%
Acquisition growth of 38.91% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
73.15%
Purchases well above TWLO's 8.82%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
192.64%
Similar to TWLO's 194.36%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
150.00%
Growth well above TWLO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
93.97%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. TWLO's 2200.41%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-22.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.01%
Negative yoy issuance while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.