PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.75%
Net income growth of 22.75% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
-3.65%
Negative yoy D&A while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
98.28%
Deferred tax of 98.28% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
0.37%
SBC growth of 0.37% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-41.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
145.06%
AR growth of 145.06% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-106.32%
Negative yoy inventory while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-123.26%
Negative yoy AP while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-95.29%
Negative yoy usage while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-125.93%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
4.39%
CFO growth of 4.39% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
24.84%
CapEx growth of 24.84% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
3.10%
Purchases growth of 3.10% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
25.95%
Liquidation growth of 25.95% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
93.33%
Growth of 93.33% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
26.12%
We expand invests by 26.12% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
16.00%
Debt repayment growth of 16.00% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.