PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.21%
Some net income increase while TWLO is negative at -2.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.65%
Negative yoy D&A while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-3200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.60%
SBC growth of 14.60% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-68.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-278.10%
AR is negative yoy while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
637.50%
Inventory growth of 637.50% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
890.00%
AP growth of 890.00% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
700.00%
Growth of 700.00% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-242.86%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 12.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
4.36%
CFO growth of 4.36% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-29.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.29%
Purchases growth of 49.29% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
7.50%
Liquidation growth of 7.50% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
77.46%
We expand invests by 77.46% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
21.43%
Debt repayment growth of 21.43% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.