743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.43%
Some net income increase while TWLO is negative at -10.58%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.44%
Less D&A growth vs. TWLO's 37.01%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
70.40%
Well above TWLO's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
9.94%
SBC growth well above TWLO's 16.84%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-98.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TWLO at -176.39%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-435.71%
AR is negative yoy while TWLO is 37.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
34.36%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TWLO's 251.36%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
306.67%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -201.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
37.84%
Growth well above TWLO's 50.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-83.33%
Both negative yoy, with TWLO at -2.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.59%
Some CFO growth while TWLO is negative at -142.21%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -19.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
90.27%
Acquisition spending well above TWLO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
18.00%
Purchases growth of 18.00% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
163.36%
Liquidation growth of 163.36% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-8.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -28.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
80.17%
Investing outflow well above TWLO's 35.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
21.28%
Debt repayment growth of 21.28% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.