743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
74.33%
Net income growth above 1.5x TWLO's 8.30%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
11.73%
D&A growth well above TWLO's 19.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
67.89%
Deferred tax of 67.89% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-1.45%
Negative yoy SBC while TWLO is 36.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-77.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TWLO at -130.97%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-174.40%
AR is negative yoy while TWLO is 34.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-0.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TWLO at -80.89%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
222.22%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -137.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1.08%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. TWLO's 90.06%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-50.00%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 989.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
28.97%
Some CFO growth while TWLO is negative at -91.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
11.28%
CapEx growth well above TWLO's 5.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
85.19%
Acquisition growth of 85.19% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-17.43%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
57.99%
Liquidation growth of 57.99% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-24.24%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
17.39%
Investing outflow well above TWLO's 5.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
47.83%
Debt repayment growth of 47.83% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.