743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.98%
Some net income increase while TWLO is negative at -12.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.89%
Less D&A growth vs. TWLO's 50.62%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1447.37%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.47%
Less SBC growth vs. TWLO's 12.13%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
170.64%
Less working capital growth vs. TWLO's 741.99%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-299.60%
AR is negative yoy while TWLO is 146.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
56300.00%
Some inventory rise while TWLO is negative at -68.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
94.44%
AP growth well above TWLO's 74.13%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
57200.00%
Some yoy usage while TWLO is negative at -7.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
75.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TWLO's 278.50%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
37.82%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of TWLO's 917.29%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-15.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -79.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
32.79%
Acquisition growth of 32.79% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
35.68%
Purchases growth of 35.68% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-24.88%
We reduce yoy sales while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-362.50%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
36.64%
We have mild expansions while TWLO is negative at -206.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to TWLO's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.